RSS 2.0
# Monday, July 04, 2005
We liked the Batman movie. We loved Batman (played by Christian Bale), Michael Caine as the loyal British servant archetype, and Liam Neeson as the good and evil anti-hero. Katie Holmes? We hated her, and webarely realized she was the same silly little girl Tom Cruise drags all over the world. She is as believable in her sincerity as an actor on a Saturday morning tween TV show. She also has a bizarre way of speaking by only moving half of her mouth. We kept expecting the drool to slither out on that corner of her mouth, since it made her look like she has had a recent stroke. Maybe it's all those vitamins she's choking down, as a new "Scien"tologist. The movie was too long, but it was much more entertaining than any previous Batman movie and much MUCH more than Spiderman.
Monday, July 04, 2005 12:43:34 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [2] -
MWB Picks
# Wednesday, June 29, 2005
Read all about it This shows why Mexico is so bass-ackwards that little baby children have to beg for handouts and scraps from US tourists at the Tijuana border. This demonstrates that Mexico is so stuck in the quagmire of a previous century that their citizens must escape from the awful-ness of it all by crawling across the border like desperate rats. This explains how Mexico, a nation as rich in natual resources as any nation on the planet, is still so poor it does not have even a 2nd World designation. story.stamp3.ap.jpg What is interesting is how much of a pass the liberal media has given Mexico and its leaders over these recent flaps. If anyone in the United States associated with any non-uber-liberal cadre of boobs had said or done anything as stupid as this, they would have been skewered and grilled, shishkabob style.
Wednesday, June 29, 2005 7:34:17 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [6] -
CNN
I'd love to know who made this spoof, they are comedic geniuses. View Video Note: Sound required and not exactly PC
Wednesday, June 29, 2005 7:21:54 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [0] -
Word on the street
# Tuesday, June 28, 2005
Dr. Laura announced to the world on her international "Dr. Laura" radio program--a radio show with a listenership comparable to Rush Limbaugh and Howard Stern--that she will personally invest her fortunes in the hotel project proposed to be built on (what is only temporarily) Supreme Court David Souter's home.
Tuesday, June 28, 2005 7:38:17 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [0] -
Word on the street
Since the liberal judges have ruled that your property rights are meaningless and the position is indefensible, the liberal media (meaning CNN, MSNBC, ABCNews, et al) are conspicuously missing any meaningful articles on the topic. However a headline pronouncing the fact that the Supreme Court took the case of anti-abortion protests holds a prominent spot on CNN.com. The case won't be heard for about a year. This, however, is BEAU-tee-full: Supreme Court justice faces boot from home? Developer wants 'Lost Liberty Hotel' built upon property of David Souter Read all about it And on non-Communist FoxNews, the story of a little old lady now defenseless against corporate pig developers. Hear that Libbies? Your libbie judges have totally empowered Corporate Pig Big Developer, the ones that chop up the giant redwoods for notebook paper and strip malls. Congrats; taste the bitter pill of your own philosophy. Read all about it
Tuesday, June 28, 2005 4:46:18 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [0] -
Word on the street
One of the most sacred and wonderful things in the United States of America has been the dedicated preservation of your private property rights. A constitutional right designed in the shadow of medieval feudalism where lords dictated when you had land and when you did not, the now-infamous decision by the Supreme Court has reversed a 200+ year history and certainly unraveled the threads of liberty our forefathers wove together. Now, as long as cities need your property and can make more money on it, they can take it. And so just like that, this decision has paved the way for your property to be seized at any time, and your intent, your future, your plans for it, are meaningless. Completely meaningless. It also renders laughable the myth that liberals, liberal judges, or liberal politicians have any concern whatsoever for the "little guy" as they claim, and every concern in the world for government expansion and government power. I knew an elderly old woman who lived in a run-down city in the eastern region of San Diego County. Her family purchased several acres about 110 years ago to farm, and of course San Diego exploded around this old farm and its farmhouse. The house itself is about 105 years old, an ancient historical landmark in California where most structures of its day were made of clay and are long dissolved. Some land was sold by previous family members. But 15 acres around the old farmhouse remain, and it stands out like a beautiful sore thumb amidst the decrepit strip malls and cheap apartments over-built around it. As the last survivor in the family besides her children, this woman repeatedly turned down offers by developers and the city, a city whose own poor planning caused the area to become "blighted." She knew the pennies they offered in the 70's and 80's were nothing compared to the potential in the years to come. What a smart woman she was; land there is now so prized, it makes the previous offers and "fair market values" comparable to the nickel sale of Manhattan. Her perseverance paid off. Her children, to whom she was so devoted she lived in a house where you could see the ground through the rotting floors, became rich. If the city, who you recall caused its own demise by over-building low income apartments and trashy strip malls, if this same city had the power of this Supreme Court ruling behind it, it would have declared her house “blighted” (it was rundown, she was an 80 year old woman caring for a large farmhouse on a Social Security pension). The historic house would have been razed and the last acres of an entire family's history sold off and forgotten, forever. Her children would have split just thousands between them instead of the millions realized, thanks to their tough old broad of a mother. Because she was willing live and work hard to create a good future for her children, that dream--a dream every American ought to be able to pursue--was realized, tenfold. THAT, my friends, is what the Supreme Court decision means to the average American. You no longer have the right to hold onto your own property for the future. If your family was lucky or smart enough to have bought property years ago, and some wealthy neighborhood has been built around it, kiss your dreams good-bye. "Fair compensation" is a vacuous platitude in the context of 200-300% property value increases in high demand communities (California in particular). A $300,000 fair market payout for a landgrab today is a lost opportunity to hold onto what will be a $1,000,000 property in just a few short years. So stay tuned, everyone; MediaWatchblog has been never been as motivated to galvanize. And we are galvanizing. Watch out Ikea, we've found you are a culprit in a similar city landgrab, and we're ready to take you out, right at one of your busiest and largest stores, the one right up the street from me in THE OC. You, and anyone like you.
Tuesday, June 28, 2005 7:00:00 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [0] -
Word on the street
# Monday, June 27, 2005
Read all about it Then what's the point? Stay poor, drive your cheap car. I suppose that's just sour grapes now isn't it...
Monday, June 27, 2005 6:09:00 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [0] -
CNN
Read all about it The soul-less BTK killer, the ice species in a container resembling that of homo sapien appeared in court today. He testified that he decided to put the people he murdered "down", as though discussing a rabid bat. I have a rabid bat for it (a him in physiology, but bearing no resemblance to any man I've ever known in any other respect), and all those like it. It gets to decide when to kill, torture, rape. It had all the power, until it just couldn't stand the lack of publicity, and it decided to send information to newspapers. Thank god its ilk has such a craving, a craving as powerful as its desire to murder. If it had not started these media blitzes, it would have never been caught. I would really love to know how we can identify these its and stop them. It is too late when they have already caused such harm, such intense grief. Isn't there a way to brain scan these monsters? Why not? I hate to mention Movie Star P-Fer Tom Cruise (aaggg...that's me choking on his idiocy) twice in one week, but there are days when shades of Minority Report sound like a good idea.
Monday, June 27, 2005 5:59:49 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [1] -
Word on the street
You may not have any god at all, just as Stalin and Lenin have showed us before. You must bow to godless beliefs You may not take any liberal cause in vain, or you will offend someone. While they may offend you you may not offend them. You must toil for six days to pay the state for all the liberal causes they desire. On the seventh day you may rest so that you are fresh to work again the next six days for free. Honor your mother and father unless they're not allowing you to bang your boyfriend when you're fifteen. You may not kill anyone unless they are cutting down a nice tree. Then, you may kill them. You may not screw around in marriage, unless you are unhappy. You may not steal, unless it is something you want. You cannot lie about a crime, unless you are a liberal college student trying to make a political statement. You must covet everything, and anything you want and do not have is a justification for anger and taxes.
Monday, June 27, 2005 8:00:00 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [3] -
Word on the street
# Friday, June 24, 2005
Watching Cruise lead a very impressionable, maleable, and rather dumb female down the dark path of Scientology makes me kinda queasy. That he is walking around telling everyone he knows--in absolutes--what's right and wrong and that we're all just living in a delusional fog, well, by golly, that earns Mr. Cruise a place on MediaWatchblog’s Movie Star Pig Fucker Hall of Lame. Read all about it Tom Cruise "tangles" with Matt Lauer on the Today show, if you call Lauer's pansy responses entangling or tough. While we give Lauer credit for even hitting on the Brooke Shields / Cruise pissing fight (instigated by Cruise), but he didn't nail him to the wall in spite of the heroic headlines Lauer is getting today. Check out Lauer’s gag-me-with-a-pitchfork gush after Cruise basically called Lauer a fool: At one point Cruise told Lauer, "You're glib" and said Lauer didn't know what he was talking about. The star launched into a detailed discussion of the use of the prescription drug Ritalin...."It's very impressive to listen to you," Lauer replied, "because clearly, you've done the homework. And you know the subject." Where are the hip waders dude! It's crotch deep in here! Here's what the Today interview looks like with MWB on the job: "So, you say you know the history of psychiatry, and that is why you call into question the entire field today. Do you understand the history of surgery, when they were using leeches and hot jars to cure people? If so, how do you reconcile visiting a doctor with a broken arm but not a broken spirit?" "You say you don't talk about things you don't understand. Then can you explain how serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, which prevent re-uptake of serotonin and thus increase the concentration of serotonin at the neural synapse, is not an effective method of increasing or stabilizing serotonin levels (a crucial component of one's overall mood) but paying Scientology a bunch of money does? What is that mechanism on the neural pathways, exactly?" I'd also ask Mr. Cruise, Knower of All things, doesn't Scientology demand that women not utter a single sound during childbirth even without pain medication, and that should they fail to do so, they have destroyed their children forever? Isn't this a bit medieval and cruel, and isn't this another sexist pig way for men to blame all the shortcomings of the children on the mother? I’d ask him, do you remember Andrea Yates? Not only did her cessation of medication cause her to plummet into a darkness and pit of mental hell Cruise could never understand, she was being given videos of a Christian freakshow dressed in a Satan outfit telling mothers they can irreparably serve their children up to the devil if they are "Bad." Funny how freakshow MEN hiding behind the cloak of rightousnous and religion always get to determine just what "Bad" women are. Isn't it, Mr. Cruise? Don't you find that an odd coincidence, Mr. Cruise? From the Christians to the Taliban to the Scientologists and back, the men get to decide what bad women are, get to take the self-righteous moral high ground, and women, at least those who can think straight, can thank jesus for giving them freedom in these United States. And for that, we give the big fat bird to movie star p-fers and everyone like them.
Friday, June 24, 2005 11:44:38 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [1] -
Hollywood P-Fers
Archive
<July 2005>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
262728293012
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31123456
Blogroll
[Feed] iGanja
About the author/Disclaimer

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.

© Copyright 2012
MediaWatchBlog.com
Sign In
All Content © 2012, MediaWatchBlog.com