RSS 2.0
# Wednesday, February 23, 2005
Read all about it Just as the research has proved for many years, the feminist claims that women make 80 cents on the dollar are anywhere from slanted to patently false. In fact, so much of the available research (helloooo femmes, that's 'r-e-s-e-a-r-c-h' as in 'scientific' as in 'method' as in 'back up your fathead claims with facts')indicates that women earn more than men in some fields. If it was truly so much cheaper to employ women, no firm in business to make money would do anything but employ women. That's an obvious fact. Few misogynists will care more about their sexist views than their wallets. In fact, I've found that pig and cheapskate seem to go hand in hand. The femmes completely ignore (it's so convenient to do so) the glaring fact that women in droves avoid high-stress, high-travel, high-danger jobs. I know not a single woman who would be a plumber even if her life depended on it. They won't work 100 feet up on electricity line poles as a repairwoman, or as Alaskan king crab fisherwomen, or as longshorewomen. Additionally, I can attest to an area patently missing women as well; the computer sciences. Just a few years back, long after the burned bra ashes had blown away, I found myself getting a BS in computer science. There were four women in the starting class of 80, and two left at the end of our program, including moi. Of course plenty of the guys dropped out too, but with only a starting number of four, there's no room for dropouts and still maintaining percentages. Forget trying to explain my little anecdote away with "girls just aren't encouraged to go into the sciences"... Yah, and a lot of guys have fathers telling them they are worthless and can't do shit either. Don't these poor guys get a pass for not having been nutured to achieve their wildest dreams and maximizing their potentials? NO? Pourquoi pas? That's because as grown-ups in a frequently harsh world, we must pick up our bootstraps, and get the job done. We must make the choice to be manicurists, receptionists, electricians, or computer scientists. We must not expect the world to bend over backwards, to create our opportunities; we must create them for ourselves and seize them when they materialize. The world will disappoint us the more we expect and demand from it without putting effort into it. With abdication of personal responsibility, how can we expect to be respected for our choices. The femmes shove big white posters of coat hangers in my face and demand freedom of choice, simultaneously they say women are too incompetent to make choices when they have the freedom to do so because some bad daddy in the past didn't help them go farther in life. So Gloria Steinham, Susan Falucci, Barbara Boxer, Diane ConFeinstein, are we responsible for our destinties, or not? Which is it?
Wednesday, February 23, 2005 10:04:56 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [2] -
Word on the street
# Monday, February 21, 2005
Read all about it It first sounds like an odd proclamation; do not allow schools to proactively prepare for terror attacks. But just a passing moment's reflection on the concept shows why. First, by any standard US students score far behind their counterparts. Either we're all stupid or we're all lazy or we're poorly educated. None of these scenarios will be much helped by terror attack preparation. Second, we must fear a government who has the power to instill fear in small children; fear of terrorists and terrorism, fear of bad people, fear of jews. Fear so easily morphs to hatred. No arachnophobe feels anything less for those daddy long legs they happily drown in the shower. The likelihood that any individual school anywhere will be attacked is so microscopically small, any diversion into terrorism prevention, reaction, whatever, is a complete waste. It's nothing short of a money and power grab by some wing, whether left- or right-wing. If this proposition had any sincerity behind it, they would start by advocating the arming of all teachers with guns, as in Israel. It's been quite effective; no Israeli school has ever been attacked. Given that their schools must be the most terror-targeted in the entire world, it seems Isreal's apporach would be the most effective place to start. It might keep a few thugs home as well so the kids could really learn, which would be one solution to problem A presented above.
Monday, February 21, 2005 5:36:31 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [0] -
Fox News
# Saturday, February 19, 2005
I have lots of ex-Californian friends. Friends who've fled to Colorado, Washington, Arizona, Nevada, Virginia, even Ohio for God's sake (but she's back!). They all send me pix of their houses and tell me, Michela, my dear, why do you stay there. Look what you get here for so much less money. This is why. It can pour down rain for 24 hours straight, then sunny and warm enough the 25th hour to put the top down on the car, and to see this view from my balcony...
PixDl12_14_04 041.jpg
and to be geographically minutes from this, on any day in January...
MyPix2 004.jpg
I'm supposed to trade this for 1000 extra sqaure and 1000 times the humidity?
Saturday, February 19, 2005 2:22:11 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [0] -
Word on the street
# Thursday, February 17, 2005
Read all about it Dr. David Graham, you are truly a vile person. Yet another pompous ivory tower know-it-all ready to dictate to all humanity that pain and pain medication are things that should remain strictly in the domains of pompous know-it-alls. Dr. Graham so easily dismisses the real pain endured by arthritis sufferers and says that the best medications they might have to control that pain are not worth the risk. Dear god Graham what planet are you living on. Start with the statistics; the worst estimates of the increased heart attacks for those using COX-2 inhibitors (such as Vioxx) is twice that the rate of everyone else. That means instead of two people out of a thousand having a heart attack, four people out of a thousand will. "Yeah but you'd hate to be one of the extra two..." Really? Not if I was in unbearable pain. Second, it is impossible for one person to categorically assert that someone else's pain is not worth the risks of those medications, never mind how small or not. Let's just say the risk is big. What kind of inhuman little Hitler (we know what free speech means too, University of Colorado) is willing to force people to suffer in pain because of risk; why are those people not allowed to assume the risk in pursuit of a better life. That's what motorcyclists do every day they ride one. What I do every day I drive a car, on US highways where over 40,000 people every single year perish. Where's the outcry there... Last, the FDA as gatekeeper to all medications is the most alarming of all. Once again, we're servile children to our big daddy government (something Republicans profess to despise) to protect us from us. They stranglehold the release of medications or cause the withdrawal of medications based on absurd increased risks. Why am I not allowed to assume those risks as an informed person?
Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:06:28 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [1] -
Word on the street
# Tuesday, February 15, 2005
Read all about it Jane Fonda goes blah blah blah about how her 35-year bout with bulimia is due to her desire to be the perfect wife, to be beautiful, blah blah about how all her dreams were destroyed when she became self-aware. While our friend in ultra Communist, ultra egalitarian Hollywood claims it was her desire for perfection that caused her to become bulimic, MWB knows the truth; it's communism that makes one upchuck one's food on a regular basis. After all, it really is enough to make you hack up your lunch, the very idea that anyone in the most class-based society on earth would spout off about esteem (translation: egalitarianism). If you've ever experienced the joys of Hollywoodland (for bloggers in the know, the original Hollywood sign read "Hollywoodland" but when "land" fell down, it was never replaced), you well know you are either an a-list, a b-list, a c-list, or a nobody. You either know somebody, or you should kill yourself. And you hang precariously in one category, always perched by one lost investment, bad movie, or invitation slight to fall one or more categories down. I was in a Hollywood restaurant a few weeks ago, and the humanity on display was enough to make me wanna barf. There was a group of 5 or 6 people in the corner, but the only talker was an animated 35-ish guy dropping names like tarnished pennies... "Dustin said it was the funniest script he'd ever seen!" His audience was rapt. The plebes grouped around this fruit and hung onto every word because he could say things like "Dustin" and "Hilary" and "Clint" and it meant something. Something really important. The waiter had to fawn over these idiots to make sure he did not alienate a FOD (Friend of Dustin). But clearly, he was annoyed. The tone of his voice was degrees more severe than simple sarcasm when he said, "Can I help you?" to the fawning crowd. Witnessing such a display one no longer wonders how Jim Jones came to be. Me, a real nobody, simply sits in the corner trying to enjoy a nice late-night meal after a fabulous trip to the Opera and observes this exchange with the interest of a psychology student. I was quite fortunate, since this was my only chance to be granted entrance to the inner sanctum--a premium a-list attended restaurant on Sunset Boulevard--it was 1 a.m. and the a-listers had moved on to a-list parties. During prime time, my only chance for a booth would be as a FOD (that earns you an automatic letter list designation). Alas, I am not; you recall, I'm a nobody. Knowing this, experiencing this, seeing this, knowing the a- list b-list c-list bullshit, Hanoi Jane makes us laugh when she pleads for young ladies to have self esteem and not to wolf up their lunches in the name of perfection. The world she promotes, the world she lives in, the very world she helped to create and continues to propagate shamelessly promotes stick figure looks and damnation to outsiders. Why would any of the girls at her little talk listen when the alluring twinkle of Follywood beckons?
Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:00:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [12] -
Hollywood P-Fers
# Monday, February 14, 2005
Read all about it Those words are: single-engine, two-seat, homebuilt, and airplane Since the predictible next word-set is: lost, crash site, human remains, medical examiner. Just words to the wise.
Monday, February 14, 2005 7:32:02 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [2] -
CNN
# Friday, February 11, 2005
Read all about it The headline is "Social Security not in Crisis, Most Say" but the first sentence is "Most Americans are certain Social Security will go bankrupt but are not ready to embrace changes that would shore up the system's finances..." The headline should be, "Americans too chickenshit to do anything about bankrupt social policies."
Friday, February 11, 2005 8:40:57 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [2] -
Word on the street
# Thursday, February 10, 2005
Los Angeles radio KFI AM 640 and its "John and Ken Show" brings us Mike Farrell, leftist activist uber ordinary who appeared at Cal Poly Pomona to babble on his opposition with the death penalty. Twenty years ago, four human beings were brutally murdered, and Pig Fucker Farrell and other activists of his ilk have taken up the cause of the murderer [It]. Its execution was stayed one year ago to re-test all the evidence, and to ensure there were no stones unturned under the noose. A year ago, Pig Fucker Farrell spoke out about this case and said racist The Man conspired yet again against The Brother. However, DNA testing and all new reviews of evidence prove once again the convicted killer is The One. The father of one of the murder victims has worked at Cal Poly Pomona for 30 years, and he and his family must have been offended by Pig Fucker Farrell's fervent efforts to spare a murderer (see lefties, we can spell that word too), right in his face, right in his own workplace. These murders were brutal. The killer's identity is not in doubt, not even to Pig Fucker Farrell. He has therefore shifted his arguments against this execution from whitey's conspiracy to calls for human compassion. The evidence, now freshly reviewed and retested, is overwhelming. We should have, he pleads, compassion for the murderer of an entire family and their son's 10 year old friend... He has the nerve to appear at this man's place of business on a key anniversary related to his son's tragic death. I wonder if anyone would continue to fawn over Pig Fucker Farrell if he showed up at, say, Intuit or Bank of America to give a speech for the crowd while the poor father must work away in his cubicle. Here, he gets to use the University as a shield and the leftist activists can pass it off as free speech instead of the inhumane harassment that it really is. For the record, Mediawatchblog is not pro death penalty. And still, we think Pig Fucker Farrell's appearance is worse than poor taste, it's evil and vile and revolting. And isn't it a shame that Scumbag Killer and Pig Fucker Farrell live while the murder victims are still dead. Many, MANY kudos to Mary Ann Hughes, the wife of the Cal Poly employee and mother of his child for countering Pig Fucker Farrell's lack of humanity with a human face. Many Kudos to the John and Ken show for exposing once again just what a Pig Fucker Farrell is. We are not giving any publicity whatsoever to Scumbag Murderer we have named It. However, here is a tribute to the victims: F. Douglas Ryen Peggy Ann Ryen Jessica Ryen, 10 years old Joshua Ryen, 8 years old (survivor) Christopher Hughes, 10 years old (inset)
Vicitms.jpg
Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:00:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [0] -
Hollywood P-Fers
# Wednesday, February 09, 2005
MSNBC ran the story that France is easing the rules on the 35 hour work-week created by the Socialists in 1998 and implemented slowly thereafter to ease unemployment. Since it has remained either in or near double digits, it hasn't helped. An overview of unemployment rates ending 2004: California (the world's 5th largest economy): 3.1% Japan: 4.4% Ireland: 4.8% UK: 5.0% US: 5.1% Australia: 5.1% Denmark: 5.4% Sweden: 5.7% Italy: 7.2% Canada: 7.3% France: 9.9% Spain: 11.3% Germany: 11.4% Poland: 19.6% Not much commentary required. While all the leftist nutcrackers whine about "free" medical care, perhaps it's good to remember: there is no free lunch. That "free" medical care is paid for by 2x the tax rate and most likely your job. It reminds me of a mildly funny line in a favorite TV show; the glamorous lead pours herself a drink from her well-appointed bar and her villainous visitor asks for one. She replies, "Buy your own." What a concept.
Wednesday, February 09, 2005 4:54:38 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [0] -
Word on the street
Read all about it Every kid with a taste for thrills has hung onto a car while on a bike, skateboard, roller blades, anything with wheels and no motor. But you hang onto the back end of the car, k? Still not as safe as a day at the library but you won't get run over by the car you are hanging onto. If you fall, see, the car is in front of you. Was this guy hanging onto the grill or what? That's (A). (B) The "kid" was 25 years old! Hopefully he hasn't reproduced yet; otherwise his death was too late to save the gene pool.
Wednesday, February 09, 2005 1:55:38 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [0] -
Word on the street
Archive
<February 2005>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272812345
6789101112
Blogroll
[Feed] iGanja
About the author/Disclaimer

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.

© Copyright 2012
MediaWatchBlog.com
Sign In
All Content © 2012, MediaWatchBlog.com