RSS 2.0
# Thursday, May 17, 2007
Go see all about it Loyal readers know I've got one toe pointed to green leanings; I recycle aluminum cans (turns out recycling paper is worse for the environment than throwing it away), I combine errands, I take my clothes to a green dry cleaners, blah blah; it's very little, I just do what I can do. But I'm getting on the high-mileage car thing lately; NOT because of global warming. That's where me n the enviro whackados part ways; I think the earth might very well be heating up. But for the same reason it was hot enough to farm on Greenland 1000 years ago... it's cyclical. There are numerous scientists--don't be fooled by the liberal media that all scientists are on Gore the Liar's side--who say this is cyclical and the greenhouse gas effects are nominal compared to the sun's impact. Mars is heating up right now too and to my knowledge it doesn't have SUVs on its roads. Er, surfaces, er,whatever. So no, my high mileage car desires stem from our ability to completely sever all ties with those who believe freedom is evil; those who think that their countries should be ruled with Sharia law--the laws that say a woman should be stoned for being raped unless there were four witnesses otherwise; those who think the world should look like 600 AD, not 2007 AD. Those people do not deserve one dime more of our money, so it's time to turn away from our high mileage cars and, well, GET SMART! Check out these adorable Smart cars; they get a whopping 60 MPG, and are about as safe as any passenger vehicle, AND, you can part two in the same space as one normal-sized car. MWB say, Get Smart! They'll be available in the US in 2008.
smart.jpg
Thursday, May 17, 2007 7:55:54 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [5] -

Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:29:23 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
I considered buying one of these. But I could not figure out where to put my surfboad. The truck model (last year) was electic only and I knew I would not make to the beach and back on one charge.
maddox
Thursday, May 17, 2007 5:00:55 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
Uh, no thanks. I'll stick with my gas-guzzling Tahoe Z71, aka "FB".
Marla
Friday, May 25, 2007 10:35:57 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
I hear ya; carting around kids n sporting crap, this ain't the car for that. But for commuting? Jeeting down to SD? This thing is the way to go.
Michela
Tuesday, May 29, 2007 2:18:21 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
i hear the rear impact rating is NA, since the rear is so close to the front that it sometimes arrives first. I wonder if the car's designers actually include the human body (aka the driver) as a crumple zone?
Tuesday, May 29, 2007 5:13:46 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
yipper, this car is not for precious cargo (kids or chihuahuas). But it gotta be safer than a motopsychle!
Michela
Comments are closed.
Archive
<February 2012>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829123
45678910
Blogroll
[Feed] iGanja
About the author/Disclaimer

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.

© Copyright 2012
MediaWatchBlog.com
Sign In
All Content © 2012, MediaWatchBlog.com