Read all about it What can I say luv. Don't kill the messenger. The headline of the money.CNN.com story is "Southwest boots woman for shirt" with a sub-heading of "Lorrie Heasley to sue for being asked to leave a flight because of her politically charged T-shirt." The first headline is correct, the second just an inflammatory tie-in. But the standard media bias is that the CNN.com link to this story reads "Airline Boots Woman for anti-Bush top" which is totally false. The fucking shirt had the word FUCKERS on it. This had nothing to do with Bush, pro Bush, anti Bush anything. It's all about a woman wearing a shirt that prominently displays the F word, a display that, mind you, money.CNN.com was mindful enough to blur out. Apparently, it's too inflammatory for their website (where nobody under 50 will be on any given day) but according to pinko CNN.com, the shirt should have been allowed on an airplane. At least money.CNN.com had it correct 50%... CNN.com was just, well, CNN.com... biased biased biased.